Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit SKB-3357's column >>

SKB-3357

Articles Posted: 0  Links Seeded: 2
Member Since: 11/2008  Last Seen: 1/20/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Dixie Chicks singer sued for defamation

Seeded on Fri Dec 5, 2008 2:22 AM EST
Read ArticleArticle Source: msnbc.com
entertainment, msnbci, celebrities
Seeded by SKB-3357
Advertise | AdChoices

Dixie Chicks singer Natalie Maines is the target of a defamation lawsuit by the stepfather of one of three 8-year-old boys slain in 1993.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

  • SKB-3357's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (253)
Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3
SKB-3357

Natalie just won't keep her big mouth shut. She has cost the group a lot of trouble.

  • 9 votes
#1 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 2:22 AM EST
Jake-757099

Times are hard now, and this just really portrays that - Shouldn't he have sued her back when all this happened, not 20 years later? Just saying

  • 1 vote
#1.1 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 8:21 AM EST
Kat-343963

I was thinking same thing..I don't care for her but something not right, why wait so long to clear your name and recoop income ect.  Money money money is motive here !!

  • 1 vote
#1.2 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 8:32 AM EST
StangSalie

The murders were 15 years ago....the statement made by Maines was less than a year ago.  It's reasonable to assume it took that long to put the lawsuit together. 

And I agree.....she needs to get her brain to mouth filter replaced.  I'm curious who told her anyone gives a flying rat's butt what she thinks anyway.

  • 8 votes
#1.3 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 8:41 AM EST
Thomas Jefferson-380547

yeah, got to keep those "uppity" women in our society quiet, right?

you're a tool.

  • 8 votes
#1.4 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 10:18 AM EST
DragonWoman

Natalie is one brave Chick!!!

If there is evidence that is pointing another way and the judge is ignoring it, then good for her taking a leap.

I hope she continues to use that "big mouth".

  • 9 votes
#1.5 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 10:44 AM EST
Tyler Durden-330839

Do any of you know the details of this crime??        All of the defendants are missing chromosones yet they were totally railroaded into prison.

  • 4 votes
#1.6 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 11:34 AM EST
Mary-368841

When will entertainers do what they're supposed to do - ENTERTAIN!  I don't give a rip what Natalie thinks about anything except an F chord and she needs to learn to keep her big mouth shut.  Their music is good but they turn me off due to her loud mouthed antics.

  • 3 votes
#1.7 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 12:11 PM EST
Christina-758604

You know, a comment like this is exactly why she wrote the song "Not Ready To Make Nice". She made a comment about Bush a few years ago and everyone got up in arms about it. And then now, all anyone talks about is how Bush sucks. So because she is an entertainer, that limits her right to freedom of speech? Because she's just suppposed to shut up and sing. She is a human being with feelings and passions and she is most certainly entitled to use her mouth to speak AND sing. I don't know the details of the case, but if it is possible that this man is the one who murdered those boys, and there are innocent men in prison for committing his crime, and she feels passionate about that, why shouldn't she speak up? That is her God given and American right! If she's right, and this man did commit the crime, the fact that she is an entertainer, gives the case a boost and might make people look into it more. It might help justice come for the right people. I say keep your mouth open Natalie!

  • 12 votes
#1.8 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 12:31 PM EST
DragonWoman

You're right Christina!

Not only does she have a right to speak her mind... She has a duty as a human being, when faced with injustice to point it out.

How many have been put in jail who are innocent?

How many have been put to death, while the so called good, respectful citizens kept their mouths closed and slept through injustice?

More should speak up. She has the mic and she uses it for more than making money and spewing the same rhetoric.

Wake up America!

  • 9 votes
#1.9 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 1:00 PM EST
al-683867

All of us have a right to free speech. We have a right to speak our minds.

We also have a right to stop listening, stop buying their products, stop attending their concerts, or stop supporting whatever their gig is if we disagree with what they are saying.
Nobody says we have to like what they say.

  • 1 vote
#1.10 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 2:13 PM EST
DragonWoman

But how many of those who were or still are can spew their hate with out reproach???

Anyone call you a bigmouth or say you have a fat mouth or start using sexist terms to demean or defame you??? Anyone discuss your sanity for not liking the Chicks??

Anyone take anything they bought from you toss it in a pile and bulldoze or set fire to it?? That goes beyond not liking or buying someones product. That is Mob Justice.

  • 4 votes
#1.11 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 4:38 PM EST
Jeremiah Johnson

Here's to hoping they finally lay this to rest.

As for the stepfather with the law-suit, he's jumping the gun. If everybody could stop an investigation just by filing a suit where would we be?

  • 2 votes
#1.12 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 6:12 PM EST
GrayHouse

As for the stepfather with the law-suit, he's jumping the gun.

I believe the statute of limitations expires a week from today. So he either files now or never.

The basis of the suit is that a hair from the stepfather of one of the slain boys was found in a shoe lace of that boy and that lace was used to tie him up during the murder. When this DNA evidence was announced, Maines alleged that it, possibly with other circumstantial evidence, indicated the guilt of the stepfather, Hobbes.

    #1.13 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 9:19 PM EST
    salongirl

    I love their music but otherwise could care less what they think about anything.  They've pretty much drove their career down the toilet with their big mouths.

      #1.14 - Sat Dec 6, 2008 9:21 PM EST
      KLconsiders

      Salongirl, you need to shut your opinonated mouth too, if that is the way it works. get of newsvine, and stay away from public opinion........if that is the standard your going to set. then live by it.

      • 2 votes
      #1.15 - Sat Dec 6, 2008 9:58 PM EST
      amy-761779

      She is not a police officer and doesn't know crap about who is guilty & who is not. She needs to learn how to keep her big mouth shut when it doesn't concern her. Toby Keith should have shut it for her a long time ago.

      • 1 vote
      #1.16 - Sun Dec 7, 2008 5:22 AM EST
      KLconsiders

      so only police officers are allowed an opinion?  ONly police officers fight for justice?  Wow, cover your ass your in for a big wake up call. Toby Keith is a neocon elitist who opens his damn mouth all the time, and he aint' no cop. Just a righteous @!$%#.  You want some truth?  Inhofe is speaking out loudly about Bush's buddy Paulson who took your money and gave it to bankers..........and you still running around telling people to shut up?!

      • 4 votes
      #1.17 - Sun Dec 7, 2008 12:14 PM EST
      DragonWoman

      Wow, Amy...

      You think a man should physically shut a woman's mouth???

      Girlfriend you need to seek help...not therapy... but some self esteem.

      I find it funny in a music genre that proclaims the singers and songwriters who speak out against injustice without fear of precaution.. OUTLAWS.

      These are the "rebels" who are revelled.

      But some like you let Clearwater and the Neo Cons tell you who to like.

      And you just promoted violence against a woman. Wow... your momma must be real proud of you.

      • 4 votes
      #1.18 - Sun Dec 7, 2008 4:58 PM EST
      Dr Know

      The basis of a defamation suit is that damage was incurred as the result of statements made that are untrue. If someone says something about you that is not true, the damage does not occur immediately. It takes time for a pattern of harm to emerge such as being terminated from jobs, turned down for jobs and other things that are attributed to the statements that are not true.

      An opinion that is repeated enough times to take on the semblance of "fact" becomes the basis for a defamation suit.

      • 1 vote
      #1.19 - Sun Dec 7, 2008 8:25 PM EST
      hippiechick68

      I have been following this case closely, as I was living in Arkanas at the time. 

      What this article doesn't say, and it doesn't sound like many posting here know...

      Natalie Maines was only one of HUNDREDS over the years who have said the exact same thing.  He is only choosing to sue her because she has money. 

      Most people in the area, or have studied the case, believe the step-father is involved. 

      • 6 votes
      #1.20 - Sun Dec 7, 2008 8:59 PM EST
      Dr Know

      Believing something does not make it true. If her statements have been the ones that led to his having problems then she is the one responsible. The simplest defense against a defamation suit is the truth. If she can prove what she has said is true, she is home free.

        #1.21 - Sun Dec 7, 2008 9:34 PM EST
        DolceSpiritus

        Very few defamation of character lawsuits actually reach the level of a court trial. Many are settled privately, in order to avoid even more damage from publicity. Since actual damages must be demonstrated, some cases are dismissed because the statements or accusations do not rise to the level of actual slander or libel. Hurt feelings or a loss of social standing may not reach the legal definition of damages.

        Another problem concerning defamation of character is the actual truth of the statement. Some may argue that in order for defamation of character to occur, the alleged victim actually has to have character to defame in the first place. Calling a known neighborhood bully a 'thug' in the local paper wouldn't qualify as defamation of character, because it isn't a statement against fact. The truth is, the truthfulness of the statement isn't always a factor in actual court proceedings.

        • 2 votes
        #1.22 - Mon Dec 8, 2008 3:54 AM EST
        DragonWoman

        She does not bare the burden of proof if he is bringing the lawsuit against her.

        She will not be able to try the case of the murders.

        She did not accuse him of murder so much as said that he is suspicious and that the 3 are innocent. He has to prove that she acted with malicious intent to accuse him of murder. Also the fact that so many have come forth before her to say the same thing or more than she, and his lawsuit is at her alone, bodes in her favor.

        I hope she does not settle.

        I wonder how all these Natalie haters would feel about a killer profiting from the murder he committed. I wonder how they would feel about themselves if it is true that he is the killer and he wins a lawsuit, they wished him to win. And they wished it solely on the basis of hate.

        • 2 votes
        #1.23 - Mon Dec 8, 2008 9:40 AM EST
        GrayHouse

        There's another aspect to consider regarding the lawsuit aside from the money. Natalie Maines has access to a national media platform that Hobbs, the man that Maines accused of murder, does not. By suing her, he gains access to that national media to publicly defend his reputation.

        She does not bare the burden of proof if he is bringing the lawsuit against her.

        Others have been already been convicted of the murders that she accused him of committing. I'm not sure how much merit the defamation case has, but Maines has put some of the burden of proof on herself. It would seem that there's been enough speculation by many, and enough circumstantial evidence to warrant her making that statement. But no one can ever guess how a jury will interpret a case if it goes to trial.

          #1.24 - Mon Dec 8, 2008 1:54 PM EST
          KLconsiders

          isn't that the truth, the jury, the judge........it's a crap shoot.

          http://www.injusticeline.com/tales.html

          • 1 vote
          #1.25 - Mon Dec 8, 2008 2:54 PM EST
          Dr Know

          Hard to defend a defamation suit if other people have been convicted of the crimes. The person with the "loudest voice" does the most damage to a reputation. If I say he did it, he cannot claim much in the way of damage. She gets more attention and therefore can cause him more "damage."

            #1.26 - Mon Dec 8, 2008 10:02 PM EST
            nearing

            Tyler Durden:

            Do any of you know the details of this crime??        All of the defendants are missing chromosones yet they were totally railroaded into prison.

            Missing chromosomes?  Are you saying that each of them has a genetic disorder?  Can you give us a source for this?

            • 2 votes
            #1.27 - Mon Dec 8, 2008 11:56 PM EST
            alec_wisner

            He's going to have a tough time proving damages.

            The really poetic thing might be if this echoes Oscar Wilde.

            If you remember, Oscar Wilde sued the Marquess of Queensberry for slander, accusing him of falsely alleging that Wilde was having an affair with the Lord's son.  Unfortunately for Wilde, truth is a defense to slander, and, in the end, Wilde went to prison for perjury.

            Now, I don't know what the truth is in this case.  But since the article indicated that the Arkansas courts are highly unlikely to reopen the case, Mr. Hobbs might want to let sleeping dogs lie.  If Natalie Maines is at all correct about new DNA evidence, this may well be the only way that Hobbs can back himself into a murder conviction.  Of course, if he is innocent, then his lawsuit is fine.

            Of course, there's the issue of damage, which is not as easy to prove as most people would think . . .

            • 4 votes
            #1.28 - Tue Dec 9, 2008 12:52 AM EST
            Chasing

            I don't give a rip what Natalie thinks about anything except an F chord and she needs to learn to keep her big mouth shut. 

            With all due respect, I don't know how good you are with an F chord, yet you haven't exactly kept your mouth shut.  Why should she?

            • 6 votes
            #1.29 - Tue Dec 9, 2008 12:56 AM EST
            Reply
            JC-525762

            I can't say that I'm sorry she's being sued. I think her comments when in Europe were disrespectful concerning the war and America....my opinion. I am hoping in favor of the father. As for the other 3, the have a confession....why is she still beating the drums for these murders? I will admit I have not followed the case that closely but when you have a valid confession......??? It will be interesting.

            • 7 votes
            Reply#2 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 2:36 AM EST
            Soylent Grin

            You might be surprised at the number of innocent people who confess to a crime. There are a number of reasons why it happens, but it's not infrequent.

            • 4 votes
            #2.1 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 3:23 AM EST
            DragonWoman

            JC:

            Her comments in Europe were spot on. Time has proved that. Clearwater's actions against her was un- American.

            Read the artical.... she pointed out the DNA evidence and the step-father's actions.

            If your only beef with her is her beliefs, then the problem is yours.

            • 6 votes
            #2.2 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 10:50 AM EST
            fedupwithliberals

            Read the artical.... she pointed out the DNA evidence and the step-father's actions.

            Is she a forensics expert? Is she a lawyer? A psychologist? Why on earth would anyone care what she has to say about this case?

              #2.3 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 2:00 PM EST
              Boo-696485

              I saw the documentary they were discussing in the article. There are some extremely strange things the step father did. They have teeth impressions from one of the bodies it does not fit the the young men in jail. The step father then went and had all his teeth pulled and got false teeth???  Now they have DNA from the bodies that matches non of the convicted killers.  His behaviour through out the documentary was very bizarre. The police conclusion these young men  were guilty because they liked devil music and had or have belief in the occult bothers me. I believe that if they now have DNA to link someone else to a crime then they deserve another day in court. But prosecutors do not like there conviction rate  messed with and this would be 3 huge profile losses. I am not a huge fan of Maines but that being what it is With out her would any of you know about this story about the Memphis 3.

              • 3 votes
              #2.4 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 2:04 PM EST
              fedupwithliberals

              Boo, I agree with almost everything you just said. However, I would have to draw the line at her openly accusing someone of a crime without knowing all the facts. She has a national audience, and to point the finger at someone because the facts she has seen perhaps point to that person can be incredibly devastating if she's wrong.

              I don't know if this guy is guilty or not, and I agree that the case needs to be looked at more closely, but to "convict" this guy without a trial is not any more fair than jailing men who may be innocent.

                #2.5 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 3:09 PM EST
                Boo-696485

                Yes very true. Thank you Fed.

                  #2.6 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 3:19 PM EST
                  DragonWoman

                  They (the police) stop investigating when they have their sacrificial lambs.

                  And for the public to ignor this and let it happen is a bigger crime.

                  • 3 votes
                  #2.7 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 4:40 PM EST
                  KLconsiders

                  you all better hope that someone takes an interest in you when the law and all that has changed in the last eight years comes to your door.  YOu better hope someone who can get a headline on your behalf does so.......because your nothing in this new world, just as those three have been nothing, and until this member of our VILLAGE got involved they could just kiss their 'probably' innocent ass goodbye.

                  She probably knows more about this case then you will ever know, given the media's tendency to draw out the mob mentality.........and once that mob turns on you, game over, or don't you recall our propensity for that.  Justice has grown into a stepping stone for careers, there are not as many "driven by the thrill of justice' attoneys left out there.  Last time I even looked into an attorney, the response was, "I don't see a way to get any money out of this".

                  No @!$%#.  and they don't check political party before they nail you should your profile fit their need.

                  • 1 vote
                  #2.8 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 7:33 PM EST
                  Reply
                  Tim Daughtry

                  Once again a celebrity thinks their input into something that is none of their business is of any value.  Who are these Dixie Chicks to think they can bash President Bush, the country that made them rich and now get involved in a legal case that has nothing to do with them.  Their arrogance is amazing and that's what keeps them opening their mouths and making fools of themselves.  They're seen as circus clowns and just keep adding fuel to that label with stunts like this.

                  • 9 votes
                  Reply#3 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 3:04 AM EST
                  Dr. Zook

                  Yeah, just because she's an American she thinks she can say anything she likes!

                  Isn't it about time the USA outlawed this whole stupid "freedom of speech thing"?

                  • 5 votes
                  #3.1 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 5:10 AM EST
                  Kat-343963

                  I feel sorry for the other 2 girls, Maines is the mouth piece and the reason the band went down in flames..maybe the other 2 should think about going out on there own !!

                  • 3 votes
                  #3.2 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 8:34 AM EST
                  God bless America

                  Freedom of speech is one thing: defamation of someone's charachter is another. She could've quietly put her money into this case, instead of making these claims.

                  • 7 votes
                  #3.3 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 8:58 AM EST
                  Tyler Durden-330839

                  You find those WMD's yet??

                  • 3 votes
                  #3.4 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 11:36 AM EST
                  Boo-696485

                  Yes yellow cake uranium was trans ported from Iraq to canada in JULY look it up!

                  • 1 vote
                  #3.5 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 2:07 PM EST
                  KLconsiders

                  ohhhhhhh, have I waited for this moment.  Natalie Maines has more Americana running through her little finger then most have streaming throught their minds!  Up until she opened her mouth no one had the courage to say what millions where thinking, most are too damn scared to say one political word if it meant they might alienate someone they needed to continue on up that wanna be ladder that conservative neocons built in the hopes that they would get their part of the trickle down before it disappeared.  common sense citizens!

                  This woman lives by the same standards we do and yet because of her ability to take to the public scene, during a concert that employs how many other americans and produces a products that employs others, she should shut her mouth, endure death threats for the privilede? Well, why not, anytime true interupts commerce someone has to die in the neocon world.  The right to speak is weighed heavily by the amount of truth in it........or she would be sued.  I didn't see Mr. Bush do anything but try to kill her career, along with his neocons zombies.

                  this man who has build a pipeline with the support of Blackwater 'guards' to bring a resource, not to mention make money for oil loyalist friends and foul how many nations doing it.  this man who has changed posse comitatus by executive order, also by executive order invoke our ability to torture human beings until they confess something, anything, (oh, I belive there is a confession in this case, anyone know how they got it?)  this man who has just changed environmental laws so that mining can pick up and dump it's poison in mountain rivers and streams and destroy our natural resources for generations as nothing will ever grow htere again.  this man who has done nothing to encourage Paulson to tell us where the money went!  this man IS AN EMBARRASMENT TO MY COUNTRY!

                  I will support the Dixie Chicks until there ain't no more Dixie Chicks to support, @!$%# if I could still have children I would name her Natalie.

                  It takes more then a regular pay check to be good damn citizen, and uphold a standard of this here republic and then let no one terrify you out of it.\

                  SHE IS A @!$%#ING HERO for having the knowledge of her own American freedoms to voice an opinion that happened to be true even after her life was threatened.

                  Reform neocons, while you still have a nation to save.

                  freedom to the Miami three.

                  • 8 votes
                  #3.6 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 7:53 PM EST
                  DragonWoman

                  KL... beautifully said!.. wish I could vote it up a few times

                  • 3 votes
                  #3.7 - Sat Dec 6, 2008 5:54 AM EST
                  nearing

                  KL:

                  Reform neocons, while you still have a nation to save.

                  Too late.  The (neo-com) overlords have put America up for sale and China is buying:

                  Fed approves Chinese bank CCB to open office in US

                  • 2 votes
                  #3.8 - Tue Dec 9, 2008 12:15 AM EST
                  Reply
                  Fil-756552

                  GOOD!!!! I have never liked Natalie Maines ever since she started running her mouth about American politics-who appointed her the judge of what is right and wrong in the world! I hope she loses her rear in the lawsuit!

                  • 3 votes
                  Reply#4 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 3:40 AM EST
                  Tyler Durden-330839

                  You find the WMD's yet???

                  • 3 votes
                  #4.1 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 11:40 AM EST
                  Boo-696485

                  This story is bigger than Maines. If there is evidence from a crime scene that matches some one else????? Would you not like to know that the 3 in jail were not rail road ed for a crime they possible did not commit????

                  • 1 vote
                  #4.2 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 2:10 PM EST
                  Reply
                  The Real DealDeleted
                  TiGer-756562

                  Hope the guy wins his defamation suit.  I am still ticked at Maines' comments in London prior to the run-up to the war.  Men and women of the US armed forces were about to hit the ground putting their lives on the line and she was giving aide and comfort to the enemy with her comments.  Then she says this on June 15, 2006, "The entire country may disagree with me, but I don't understand the necessity for patriotism; Why do you have to be a patriot? About what? This land is our land? Why? You can like where you live and like your life, but as for loving the whole country... I don't see why people care about patriotism." Just a spoiled rich entertainer sneering at the very country that made her rich.  Yeah...I am definitely hoping this guy wins his lawsuit big-time. 

                  • 6 votes
                  Reply#6 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 3:49 AM EST
                  The Real DealDeleted
                  mega-lodon

                  the war on terrorisim......ummmm, go back to page 1, start with the twin towers, and work your way thru....you will findthat when we went to war, it was going to be in theglobal stance against terrorisim approved by the House.....A War on Terrorists

                  • 1 vote
                  #6.2 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 5:29 AM EST
                  Spitfire

                  Is anyone here familiar with this case? Hobbs is as guilty as sin! Watch his police interivew video and it's pretty obvious. What Maines has said is what hundreds of thousands of other people have been saying for a long time. This is not a Dixie Chicks issue. It's about 3 innocent people being sent to prison because some backwoods cops can't admit that they don't know how to do their jobs.

                  • 8 votes
                  #6.3 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 8:54 AM EST
                  God bless America

                  I agree with you regarding the incident in Europe. And you know, these elitist wealthy entertainers will not be impacted by "sharing of the wealth" at all.

                  • 2 votes
                  #6.4 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 9:00 AM EST
                  DragonWoman

                  Oh I don't know "Real Deal" pick a war:

                  The War on Drugs

                  The War on Terrorism

                  The War our Civil Rights

                  • 4 votes
                  #6.5 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 11:01 AM EST
                  Tyler Durden-330839

                  You find the WMD's yet?

                  • 3 votes
                  #6.6 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 11:40 AM EST
                  logdump

                  You trying to get Boo to post that yellowcake bull again?

                  BTW the yellowcake he refrs to was not weapons grade and Iraq did not have the capacity to turn it into weapons grade and The UN and the inspectors knew it was there and I could go on for a long time but just one thing kills his argument. Evn Bush has not used that as evidence

                  • 1 vote
                  #6.7 - Wed Dec 10, 2008 5:51 AM EST
                  mattielax61

                  Wars on nouns can't be won.  And police action my @$$.

                  • 2 votes
                  #6.8 - Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:14 AM EST
                  Reply
                  Steve-756564

                  Self -Destructive... A Head-Scratcher in as much as where is the leadership in their organization? As for the content of Maines comments here and in the past, their pathological, less to do with validity, more to do with effect. How does she justify the loss of credibility, professionalism, and no doubt, income to her fellow chicks, and all the staffs? A strange girl...

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#7 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 3:51 AM EST
                  ASignOfTheTimes

                  Does anyone care about this? I don't

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#8 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 4:01 AM EST
                  rlp171

                  Good!! I hope the law suit breaks the bank with this group of political venom spewing clowns. If they can't just stick to singing their talentless songs, take up a cause of saving the butterflies or something. Once again they have proven to be the "Chixie Dix". If I never heard from them again in any manner, it would be too soon.

                  • 3 votes
                  Reply#9 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 4:49 AM EST
                  Tyler Durden-330839

                  You find the WMD's yet??

                  • 3 votes
                  #9.1 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 11:45 AM EST
                  fedupwithliberals

                  Tyler, do you actually have anything constructive to say, or are you just going to keep parroting the same line over and over?

                    #9.2 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 2:20 PM EST
                    Tyler Durden-330839

                    so your answer is no?     P.S,   MAVERICK  MAVERICK MAVERICK

                    • 1 vote
                    #9.3 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 2:55 PM EST
                    Tyler Durden-330839

                    P.P.S.  even the chimp was sad about no wmd's      You see the interview this week?

                    • 2 votes
                    #9.4 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 3:00 PM EST
                    Reply
                    STFU

                    Natalie Maines deserves solid respect for speaking out against straight up bull@!$%#. First off, she was rightly critical of Bush and his destructiive policies while all of the above posters were not only uncritically licking his boots but railing against any and all dissenters. As far as the West Memphis Three are concerned, if you want to know about the case go to Wikipedia and look up "West Memphis Three". You should view both of the HBO documentaries, Paradise Lost: The Child Murders at Robin Hood Hills and Paradise Lost 2: Revelations before passing judgement on Maines. Other well known individuals who have committed time and energy to allow the West Memphis Three a voice include:

                    Metallica, Winona Ryder, Henry Rollins, Robert Smith (of the Cure), Hank Williams III, Trey Parker (of South Park), Will Ferrell, Margaret Cho, Jello Biafra, Eddie Spaghetti (of the Supersuckers), and many others.

                    Natalie Maines is not alone. So @!$%# right off you spineless asshats.

                    • 11 votes
                    #10 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 5:07 AM EST
                    Dr. Zook

                    The US "justice" system is more about finding someone to blame than actual justice.  Notice how black and Hispanic people are minorities in US society and yet make up the bulk of those in prison.  Notice how judges and prosecutors fight revisiting evidence with DNA testing after a conviction, even though the use of this technology has proven people to have been wrongfully convicted time and time again.

                    The real outrage here is that it takes millions of dollars and the efforts of high profile celebrities for regular people to defend themselves in a US courtroom.  But who cares about that, as long as we find someone to blame and lock up in the dungeons of the US penal system.

                    • 4 votes
                    #10.1 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 5:18 AM EST
                    mega-lodon

                    hmmm real grownup language , asshats?, my kid said something like that when she was 14, perhaps a few people need to grow up, and get with the program. # people confess...all 3...now in the light of things, if it were just 1 person...errr maybe 2, i might have taken a 2nd thought as to perhaps something is amiss. However, all 3 confessed, all 3 had evidence against them, and all 3 were convicted,jailed, and hopefully never heard from ever, such as Maines should be. We all have something to say about something, , looking at Your great thrill of concern STFU, and Dr Zook, you both think the world is out to conspire against someone because of some feeling of whatever it might be in your life, but look....there is a thing called justice....if you say you DIDNT do it, you get to challenge evidence, even if it is your own confession. When you are interviewed for such a thing, it is recorded, on audio, and as well video....as to lay proof the IF you confess or deny allegations, 1 that you were not beaten coerced, or bribed into doing either.  2 To show the state of mind you are in at the time of interview...and the list just whips right along as for those reasons....interviews with suspects, and even witnesses, or on 2 separate tapes, 1 audio, 1 video/audio.

                     So please calling someone an "asshat" because you do not understand something, for instance that because a Chixi Dix says something, does not mean it is true, some people like infants, make noise, just for attention, such as I feel Maines does....Perspnally i think Maines is not all that attractive, has no talent outside of running spewage, and thinks her career is actually going to go somewhere, by having the slim few for groupies help take her voice on a pointless issue will help. All i can say to her is good luck with that, let me know how it works out for you.....wait, 2nd thought, i don't care how it works out for her, she's a loser.

                    • 2 votes
                    #10.2 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 5:52 AM EST
                    spike-322306

                    "..Notice how black and Hispanic people are minorities in US society and yet make up the bulk of those in prison...."

                    Reasonable.  They commit the bulk of the crimes.

                    • 5 votes
                    #10.3 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 6:29 AM EST
                    mega-lodon

                    black, and hispanic combimed are not a minority, nor do i think they should be reffered to as any longer. the term "minority" means pity me, because i have a less count of bretheren as yorself. In all aspect, with everyone being so EQUAL and all, ect, ect, ect, there is no minority, its a way of playing the race card, without calling it a racecard....kinda like instead of a joker being wild, tossing in 2's or jack's.

                    • 2 votes
                    #10.4 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 6:47 AM EST
                    GrumpyLB11

                    STFU, I can understand from your comment why you support her. Apparently you too, are a complete idiot and just as stupid.  I wonder how many people other than myself wish you would just shut up and go away?

                    • 3 votes
                    #10.5 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 8:44 AM EST
                    Spitfire

                    Hear, hear STFU!!!

                    • 5 votes
                    #10.6 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 8:56 AM EST
                    God bless America

                    Is this considered respectful discourse? The individual in question may be guilty. Does that give a person the right to defame his charachter?What if he is innocent? Better to quietly put your money into an investigation so that you can see justice served. Perhaps that will occur now, in the course of the defamation litigation: if he is now found innocent, will you believe that? In addition,when your country is at war, and young people are putting their lives on the line for freedom, is "I hate Bush" and "I don't claim him as my president" really effective protest? It is small wonder Europeans percieve us as rude, and uncivilized. And Megan, my children had a buddy that used the term "butt nugget" when he was in 4th grade - thought you might want to add that to the juvenile expressions you've now heard! When they were in 4th grade it was kind of funny, but I raised my kids to engage in respectful debate, rather than use colorful metaphors such as that and "ass hat," in order that they appear to be adults when they are adults.

                    • 2 votes
                    #10.7 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 9:08 AM EST
                    Jon Bruford

                    yeah! dude, cos it's people inbred rednecks like the dixie chicks that account for the worldwide revulsion at the dishonesty, corruption and all round asshattedness of the great satan, and nothing at all to do with the illegal wars, the coercion of the UN, the illegal concentration camp in cuba, the illegal torture, the flat refusal to subject their stormtroopers to international law, no matter who they kill in whatever circumstances.

                    Nahh tll that is gust good 'ol boys playing a bit rough.

                    • 1 vote
                    #10.8 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 10:44 AM EST
                    GrayHouse

                    Notice how black and Hispanic people are minorities in US society and yet make up the bulk of those in prison.

                    That is irrelevant in this seed. The victims, perps, families and all involved in this WM3 case are white. The only person of color is a story of a bloody black man who washed himself in a fast food restaurant's restroom the night of the murder — I don't think there was ever any verification of that story.

                    • 1 vote
                    #10.9 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 11:03 AM EST
                    DragonWoman

                    STFU... Thank God someone on here makes some damn sense!!!!!

                    I stopped listening to WGNA (a NY country station) because they started to refer to Natalie as insane. I love country music, but I am sick to death that a woman's sanity is brought into question when ever she speaks her mind and a small minded group does not agree. And I will no longer stand for it.

                    Thank you!!

                    • 2 votes
                    #10.10 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 11:08 AM EST
                    spike-322306

                    "... And I will no longer stand for it...."

                    So--disagreement with whatever you may think, should not be allowed?  I am curious, have you ever heard of free speech? 

                    • 3 votes
                    #10.11 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 11:59 AM EST
                    DragonWoman

                    Yes I have heard of free speech.

                    And guess what???

                    After I heard WGNA debate her sanity, I simply changed the stations.

                    • I did not call the station and complain
                    • I did not take all their signs and burn them in an effigy.
                    • I did not take to the press and write hatefull things about them.
                    • I don't even remember their names, I don't loose sleep on it.
                    • In fact until now I never even mentioned it. 

                    So sure they had a right to debate a woman's sanity.

                    I just left hearing the conversation and never looked back.

                    Too bad ya'all are stuck on pause. So much so you don't bother to read the details of the case. 

                    • 3 votes
                    #10.12 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 12:16 PM EST
                    libra7288

                    THANK YOU, STFU!!!!

                    You and Dragonwoman seem to be the only ones so far who have written intelligently on this subject.

                    I've sent you a friends request!

                    Go Natalie!

                    Cheers & Happy Holidays

                    • 5 votes
                    #10.13 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 12:20 PM EST
                    DragonWoman

                    Libra,,, You are already on mine.

                    Thank you for joining the conversation.

                    All I have seen is the same ole crap I have been hearing from the same folks that think Palin is right for office.

                    • 3 votes
                    #10.14 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 1:03 PM EST
                    fedupwithliberals

                    Other well known individuals who have committed time and energy to allow the West Memphis Three a voice include:

                    Metallica, Winona Ryder, Henry Rollins, Robert Smith (of the Cure), Hank Williams III, Trey Parker (of South Park), Will Ferrell, Margaret Cho, Jello Biafra, Eddie Spaghetti (of the Supersuckers), and many others.

                    How many of them hold a law degree? How many are forensic scientists? I guess we should give their opinions more weight than those of the judges, prosecutors and jury who heard all the evidence?

                    • 3 votes
                    #10.15 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 2:24 PM EST
                    DragonWoman

                    maybe they should, get somebody to LOOK at the evidence.

                    • 3 votes
                    #10.16 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 4:30 PM EST
                    Dr. Zook

                    I said:  "..Notice how black and Hispanic people are minorities in US society and yet make up the bulk of those in prison...."

                    So Spike responded:   "Reasonable.  They commit the bulk of the crimes."

                    Yeah like in in Paris, Texas, where judge sentenced a fourteen year old BLACK girl to seven years in prison for pushing a teacher’s aid.  The girl had no previous arrest record, and the teacher’s aid wasn’t hurt. Three months earlier, the same judge sentenced a fourteen year old WHITE girl, convicted of arson, to probation.

                    I notice that in articles I have read, where people have been proven to be erroneously convicted of a crime and later released, they have invariably been black men.

                    It does not surprise me then that statistics show that "they" (non-whites) "commit the bulk of the crimes" when the US justice system system is so blatantly racist.

                    • 2 votes
                    #10.17 - Sun Dec 7, 2008 8:24 AM EST
                    DragonWoman

                    Yeah like in in Paris, Texas, where judge sentenced a fourteen year old BLACK girl to seven years in prison for pushing a teacher’s aid.  The girl had no previous arrest record, and the teacher’s aid wasn’t hurt. Three months earlier, the same judge sentenced a fourteen year old WHITE girl, convicted of arson, to probation

                    No Dr Zook,

                    Why notice something like that. It might make people all sad... lets all take pot shots at a celebrity woman who should keep her "catfish" mouth shut.

                    • 1 vote
                    #10.18 - Sun Dec 7, 2008 4:52 PM EST
                    alec_wisner

                    "How many of them hold a law degree? How many are forensic scientists? I guess we should give their opinions more weight than those of the judges, prosecutors and jury who heard all the evidence?"

                    That was then and this is now.  Apparently, those with law degrees and forensic scientists are attempting to reopen the case based on evidence not presented to the court and jury at the original trial.  If you're not aware, a shockingly high number of convicted prisoners are freed on an ongoing basis because of later proof of innocence, a fair number from death row!

                    It seems that in Arkansas, as in most states, it is next to impossible to reopen a case.  Most prosecutorial agencies will remain deaf to new evidence rather than surrender a past victory.  Most trial judges are retired by the time these issues arise, and many retired trial judges are among those pleading for such cases to be reopened.

                    So what's left for those who care?  Well, celebrities are in a position to use their fame to draw public attention to the plight of those who suffer, in their opinion unfairly, in the darkest recesses of our legal system.  No, they are not attorneys.  Nor are they forensic scientists.  But the attorneys and forensic scientists don't have teh same public cachet as do celebrities.

                    I'm sure that it bothers your conservative temperament when anybody, espacially an outspoken liberal, tries to shake up the existing order.  But, then again, from the point of view of the wrongfully accused, there isn't enough that can be done.

                    Again, if there is nothing here, then nothing will ultimately happen.  Perhaps Maines will have to pay a libel judgment.  So be it.  But to take the position that her views are somehow invalid because she's a singer or because she publicly criticized Bush?  Well, to me, that's just plain un-American.

                    • 3 votes
                    #10.19 - Tue Dec 9, 2008 1:17 AM EST
                    Justme-517872

                    If it were almost anyone else there would probably be a lot less criticism. Maines has made a complete and utter idiot out of herself on more than one occasion so she has little or no credibility with many people. Unfortunately in this situation her rep is overshadowing the case itself.

                      #10.20 - Tue Dec 9, 2008 8:48 AM EST
                      logdump

                         Now now does that also make the hundreds of thousands of people who also believe in what she said utter idiots also. Courts in the southern end of this country almost always defend the results of the first trial. This guy is looking for a fast buck and must prove that what she said did him harm. The fact that he was questioned by the police in the killings made him a suspect.

                      • 1 vote
                      #10.21 - Wed Dec 10, 2008 6:03 AM EST
                      Justme-517872

                      No, just Maines ;)  I checked out some of the stories and the web site and sad part is she's probably right about him. Hopefully people will be able to get past the fact that is it Maines and focus on the issue that actually needs the attention. Someone with a bit more credibility would be a lot more helpful in getting this case the attention it needs.

                        #10.22 - Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:30 AM EST
                        DragonWoman

                        I am glad they are looking at the case. I never heard about it until the hoopla about Maines.

                        I hope this guy diggs himself a deep hole based on his greed. Here in New York we have laws to prevent criminals from profiting on their crime. He may have nearly gotten away with it. But he got greedy.

                        The man changed his teeth, to hide evidence. And there are fools who are spending more time caring about what comes out of Natalie's mouth.

                        • 1 vote
                        #10.23 - Thu Dec 11, 2008 10:20 AM EST
                        Reply
                        Joeb929

                        Are they finally realizing that Mumia won't be getting another trial? That God for our celebrities who feel like they are the saviour of the world. Stick to playing a banjo.

                        • 1 vote
                        Reply#11 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 6:11 AM EST
                        LACAT

                        I had the misfortune of attending a Dixie Chicks concert pre anti American days. The woman is a trouble maker. She was asked by the venue management to request people in certain area (small area-2 or 3  short rows) to remain seated so that handicapped individuals could also enjoy the concert. The seating arrangements were not the best, but management was attempting to correct a problem. Maines disreguarded the request, encouraged EVERYONE to get on their feet (singled out those particular rows) and went on to ridicule the "organizers". She was up on her soap box about some stupidity ...PLEEZ....just sing already and SHUT UP!!!!! We left the concert.

                        • 4 votes
                        Reply#12 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 6:27 AM EST
                        God bless America

                        Another entertainer whose music I will not purchase.

                        • 4 votes
                        #12.1 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 9:09 AM EST
                        logdump

                        Pre AntiAmerican? Where is she Anti American. 70% of of Americans believe what she said about Bush and the war in Iraq. Are 70% of americans AntiAmerican. Too many times people with weak positions fall back on that AntiAmerican line.

                        Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel. Samuel Johnson 

                        • 1 vote
                        #12.2 - Wed Dec 10, 2008 6:07 AM EST
                        DragonWoman

                        I consider the last 8 years and the Palin part of the McCain campaign to be Anti-American.

                        • 1 vote
                        #12.3 - Thu Dec 11, 2008 10:22 AM EST
                        Reply
                        Leeloo-359341

                        She just can't figure it out to keep her big fat mouth shut.  Her singing even sucks.  She should move to Europe where no one cares about her.  I hate her and the Dixie Chicks.  Go away you big mouth pig.

                        • 2 votes
                        Reply#13 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 6:57 AM EST
                        Leeloo-359341

                        Oh by the way!  Take all her money to.  She is an Asshat.  Her hot Husband should leave that ugly, fat pig and take her money with him.  Let her work for a living and see how she likes it.  She makes me sick.  I hope she ends up living in a cardboard box along the sewers of a city.  Would not hurt my feelings at all.

                          Reply#14 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 7:00 AM EST
                          DragonWoman

                          You are pathetic and definately not a Christian!

                          The fact that you are lusting after her "hot" husband makes you cheap as well.

                          • 5 votes
                          #14.1 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 11:10 AM EST
                          Reply
                          Linda-399775

                          She was right about GW. Maybe she's right again.  If defamation of character lawsuits become "popular" we'll have to build additional jails for all the republican liars.

                          • 4 votes
                          Reply#15 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 7:13 AM EST
                          Joeb929

                          Sorry Linda but don't be stupid, do you honestly believe democrats don't lie? I am a registered democrat and I know if a politicians lips are moving their usually lying.

                          • 2 votes
                          #15.1 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 7:25 AM EST
                          Go USA

                          Defamation lawsuits usually end in the guilty party paying money not jail time.  And yes, this Reublican agrees somewhat with Joeb929.  When a politician is speaking, you can almost be certain that he/she is not telling the whole truth.  Rather, they are only telling the part that will win them votes. 

                          • 3 votes
                          #15.2 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 7:47 AM EST
                          Katy-376326

                          I suspect Linda is a typical Bay Area liberal still deriding those in the heartland "clinging to their crosses and religion."  Maines is just too stupid to understand she was in a business that doesn't need a mouthpiece for her liberal vents.  Celebrities have every right to speak their mind, but they can support their causes with a check or a quiet, dignified statement that would cause people to question the investigation.  There has to be another agenda for Ms. Maines behind all her name calling.  Don't know what it is and don't care.   

                          • 1 vote
                          #15.3 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 10:14 AM EST
                          Jon Bruford

                          lol! every right to speak their mind, just so long ans you agree?? isn't that what you mean?

                          you people crack me up

                            #15.4 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 10:47 AM EST
                            Katy-376326

                            No, Jon.  It wouldn't be any fun or help us crystalize our opinions, if we didn't have a dialogue with the opposition.  Is that too hard for you to understand?  BTW, who are "you people?"

                              #15.5 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 11:37 AM EST
                              DragonWoman

                              Celebrities have every right to speak their mind, but they can support their causes with a check or a quiet, dignified statement that would cause people to question the investigation. 

                              So Katy,

                              It is not what she said but the way she said it that has your skirt all in a bunches????

                              Perhaps you should give all of us an etiquette lesson on how we should speak.

                              Perhaps write your Senator and Congress and have them create a bill to add an amendment curbing just how our Freedom to Speak should be used.

                              • 1 vote
                              #15.6 - Thu Dec 11, 2008 10:30 AM EST
                              Katy-376326

                              Dragon person -

                              Who says there can't be a "civilized" conversation about politics and not some rant that tries to destroy the credibility of one who opposes an opinion?  Apparently, "civilized" is not part of your dictionary.  Too bad.  We could accomplish so much more if it were important to all of us.  It really isn't about proper etiquette, but kindness within the person.  Good manners, I've been told, are simply the "grease" that allows us to have a civilized society.  Try it, it could ease the anger within you.

                                #15.7 - Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:35 PM EST
                                KLconsiders

                                Katy darling!  at last a true blue civilized conversation...........without you we would continue to throw ourselves about in our trailer park anger and simply waste away from ignorance, striving for betterment if only to procure to our big box store delighted little hearts!

                                Dragon(person)?  wow, where you lowering yourself through political correctness?  or just using your language to raise yourself up above the 'fray'.  Kindness lives in many places.  It isn't up to you to set the standards of how that is distributed.  Careful........you bs is showing.

                                by the way...........how did you feel about the article, or did you come in to put posters down.  which would in a strange way, make your comments, the comment of an elitist pimp.

                                  #15.8 - Thu Dec 11, 2008 3:16 PM EST
                                  DragonWoman

                                  Katy:

                                  I always find it funny when someone who disagrees with me, starts out by mangling my handle (DragonWoman... really is simple... isn't it???)

                                  and then starts to go at me with "civilized conversation"

                                  a bit of an oxymoron.

                                  Been someone of good manners, still do from time to time... I do know from experience that sometimes you have to shout to be heard. If that does not make me a lady... I will make my peace with God.... not you.

                                  KL: ????????????

                                  not sure if you are being satirical. I can be sloooooowww.

                                  comment of an elitist pimp?????

                                  Not sure how I did this, If you find something I say BS... feel free to shout it out. I do so if I see a scene in a movie, or hear something that is.

                                  Did read the article... was a while a go, as this vine is building over time. I am disturbed by our justice system. When I started on this particular vine, back on the 5th, I saw something that disturbed me just as much as injustice..... mob like hatred.

                                  Let us just put a person we can all hate on on a vine and each take turns hurling stones at her. I don't know if this guy is guilty... evidence sounds strong.

                                  I know I have grown tired of this particular argument.

                                  peace out =}

                                    #15.9 - Thu Dec 11, 2008 7:09 PM EST
                                    KLconsiders

                                    Dragonwoman, I was speaking to how Katy was addressing you, the entire comment is for Katy's edification. 

                                    sorry if I wasn't clear.  Katy comment erked me, 

                                      #15.10 - Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:18 PM EST
                                      DragonWoman

                                      We're cool, like I said I can be slow. She is not the only one who has come at me and won't be the last. I have been called DragonFart, DragonFly, etc (surprised not DragonB!tch)... Think it says more about the person dishing it.

                                      Catch you around the Vine. Probably should have been done with this site awhile ago.

                                        #15.11 - Fri Dec 12, 2008 8:27 AM EST
                                        Reply
                                        Puck2u

                                        She is a catfish. All mouth and no brain!!!

                                        • 1 vote
                                        Reply#16 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 8:02 AM EST
                                        GrumpyLB11

                                        I Love It. I knew her mouth would be her downfall. I hope the guys gets everything he asks for. She deserves to be raked across the coals. She is nothing but a big mouth, stupid and not very talented has been. Her group is done for. She should quit and go back to her lot lizard days. Make another trucker happy in the parking lot.

                                        • 3 votes
                                        Reply#17 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 8:38 AM EST
                                        NancyLou

                                        It's about time someone made this loud-mouthed blowhard responsible for her actions.  I am all for freedom of speech, but even the Supreme Court has further defined freedom of speech to exclude language that is inflammatory in nature.

                                        I can't even listen to the Dixie Chicks any longer, since their tirade against America several years ago.  It's one thing to hate us in our own country, but to hate us in Europe?  They're traitors and they don't represent that which is great in this country.

                                        I hope they (Maines) loses their respective shirts in a trial and have to file bankruptcy as a result.  Oh, wait, that'd mean they have to keep singing and recording to make more money.  Oh, shoot, I really wish they'd just fade away into obscurity.

                                        Oh, and one of the few detractors here, in defending the Dixie Chicks, is one of the lone to use foul language and call the rest of us names.  Wow, that's the person I'd want defending ME!

                                        • 3 votes
                                        Reply#18 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 8:43 AM EST
                                        God bless America

                                        Well said.

                                        • 1 vote
                                        #18.1 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 9:10 AM EST
                                        DragonWoman

                                        Yeah NancyLou, you're all for that freedom of speach and all except when you don't agree with it.

                                        Inflammatory is only when someone is all upset.

                                        Defamation is only if she is wrong.... It will be interesting if she is not.

                                        I wonder if all you Natalie haters would take your words back or apologize. I seriously doubt it, ( that would take integrity)since she was right about Bush (who lacks integrity).... Who by the way is not a real Texan.... but a poser.

                                        • 2 votes
                                        #18.2 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 11:20 AM EST
                                        Tyler Durden-330839

                                        You find those WMD's yet???

                                        • 2 votes
                                        #18.3 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 11:49 AM EST
                                        logdump

                                           I spent years in the record business and this will only improve their sales as it did after the Bush statement. Their concerts have been consistently sold out and that dear friends is where the real money is in that business. Controversy gets your name in headlines and for every person who probably would not go to their concerts or buy their records anyway there are in their case 10 that think they are picking on them and will support them. After all its all about music. In my collection I have many selections that are by people who have different opinions than myself. I play them for the music not their political beliefs. I am sure this person is convinced that the cause she supports is the correct one. If she does she has the right to speak out on it just like any of us have. If she harmed this fellow in any way she should pay but that is for the courts and the lawyers to decide. All we have to go on is the few paragraphs devoted to the story and that is not enough to make an informed decision.

                                        • 1 vote
                                        #18.4 - Wed Dec 10, 2008 6:21 AM EST
                                        Reply
                                        viv103

                                        She let her alligator mouth over load her Jaybird ass......again.  The woman has hoof and mouth disease.  She needs to just keep singing those wang, tang tunes and keep her opinions to herself.

                                          Reply#19 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 9:02 AM EST
                                          MgoBlue

                                          Hey Birdbrain - don't just shut up and sing... Just shut up.

                                            Reply#20 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 9:23 AM EST
                                            NOObama2012

                                            Honestly, Natalie and the Dixiedunces....they continue to plumb new depths of breathtaking stupidity. Someone needs to tell them that it is better to keep your mouth shut and let others wonder if you are an ignoramus, than to repeatedly open it and remove all doubt. 

                                            The fact that they would voluntarily take up the cause of child abusers and murderers....it is beyond horrifying....

                                            America to Dixiechicks: DROP DEAD!

                                              Reply#21 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 9:26 AM EST
                                              ReadAboutIt

                                              I only wish this would spark people interest so they would go look at the case rather than just bashing the Dixie Chicks.  The one boy that confessed is borderline mentally retarded and his confession doesn't match what happened.  He was also held for most of the day without parents or a lawyer there and only the last 30 minutes or so of "confession" are taped.   The so-called evidence in the case is that Jessie named them in his confession, the boys listened to heavy metal music, read about the Wiccan religion, and a girl saying she over heard a comment which she now says she didn't hear.  There is NO physical evidence to show involvement by any of them.  The experts involved now don't even think the boys were killed there in the woods where Jesse's "confession" says it all happened.

                                              There are many, many people that now believe due to DNA evidence that this kids stepfather was involved.  Even some of the parents of the three little boys don't believe the WM3 committed the crime. I really don't get how the courts with new DNA evidence and the original joke of a trial can get away with not allowing a new trial.  The judge that ruled on the latest motion was the original trial judge who has since been promoted to the appeals court.  How is that fair in any sense of the word?

                                              Set aside your hatred of Natalie Maines and go visit . It's horrible what happened to the three little boys but what happened and is continuing to happen to the three teenagers is awful as well.

                                              • 6 votes
                                              Reply#22 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 9:29 AM EST
                                              DragonWoman

                                              I have a brother who is autistic. We had a problem keeping him from going after fire alarms.

                                              I always worry about him getting mixed up with some legal mess. Finding his way into something he may have not done, but not knowing how to communicate. Not knowing how to stand up for yourself.

                                              Unless you have been in those shoes, or seen them from up close.... you have no idea how easy it is to manipulate someone into being the scapegoat.

                                              thank you readabout it. =}

                                              Shame on the legal system... not on someone who shines a light on it.

                                              • 1 vote
                                              #22.1 - Thu Dec 11, 2008 10:35 AM EST
                                              Reply
                                              Brent Koller

                                              I guess she didnt learn the first time,,,,,,

                                              • 2 votes
                                              Reply#23 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 9:42 AM EST
                                              hippiechick68

                                              I hate to point it out to you, but history proves that most Americans agree with what she said the FIRST time. 

                                              • 3 votes
                                              #23.1 - Sun Dec 7, 2008 8:37 PM EST
                                              Dr Know

                                              Agreeing with something does not make it true...

                                                #23.2 - Sun Dec 7, 2008 9:34 PM EST
                                                Jeremiah Johnson

                                                Dr Know

                                                Agreeing with something does not make it true...

                                                I agree with what she said the first time. I wrote about what she said the first time. Hundreds of other also agreed and wrote about what she said the first time, eventually tens of thousands agreed and last I heard 250,000,000 million americans, 360,000,000 europeans and about a billion or so others finally discovered the truth and agree that she was right the first time ...

                                                To top it off, the big cheeze hisself even agrees he was wrong ...

                                                go figure

                                                • 2 votes
                                                #23.3 - Mon Dec 8, 2008 2:17 AM EST
                                                DragonWoman

                                                No, I agree with Dr Know:

                                                Agreeing with something DOES NOT make it true. Many agreed with Bush (for awhile). And how many are chanting "Sarah".

                                                But neither does a lot of hate filled statements ( with derogatory words) telling someone to SHUT UP, and sing.

                                                • 2 votes
                                                #23.4 - Mon Dec 8, 2008 9:17 AM EST
                                                logdump

                                                Agreeing with someone does not ALWAYS make it true. Some who agree with anothers statements know the facts to be true.

                                                • 1 vote
                                                #23.5 - Wed Dec 10, 2008 6:26 AM EST
                                                Jeremiah Johnson

                                                Let us review:

                                                On the eve of the Iraq invasion, while in concert in London for the 2003 Top of the World Tour, Maines commented that the Dixie Chicks were...

                                                "Just so you know, we're ashamed the President of the United States is from Texas."[2]

                                                Negative public reaction in the United States to this comment resulted in a loss of standing in the country music industry for the Dixie Chicks. Boycotts by country music radio stations and death threats hindered the band's continued success.

                                                I agree with this completely. And it's a true statement from their point of view. I'll take it a step further and say I am ashamed that so many of my fellow americans voted this guy a second term.

                                                • 1 vote
                                                #23.6 - Wed Dec 10, 2008 12:42 PM EST
                                                KLconsiders

                                                I agree with Jeremiah Johnson.

                                                *raises hand to be counted*

                                                • 1 vote
                                                #23.7 - Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:11 PM EST
                                                Reply
                                                Eric the MidgetExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                                Before Natalie deals with this BS lawsuit, she has to deal with me and Johnny Frato.  I want my oral!  Bye for now.  Ack Ack!!!   Red Rock!!!

                                                • 1 vote
                                                Reply#24 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 9:45 AM EST
                                                MgoBlue

                                                Who made her the spokesperson for everyone? She must think the world can't get along without her brand of genius.

                                                • 2 votes
                                                Reply#25 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 9:46 AM EST
                                                Eric the Midget

                                                Before Natalie deals with this BS lawsuit, she has to deal with me and Johnny Frato.  I want my oral!  Bye for now.  Ack Ack!!!   Red Rock!!!

                                                • 1 vote
                                                Reply#26 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 9:46 AM EST
                                                Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3
                                                Leave a Comment:
                                                You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                                                (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                                                Newsvine Privacy Statement
                                                As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                                FUN STUFF:
                                                • Leaderboard |
                                                • E-Mail Alerts |
                                                • Top of the Vine |
                                                • Newsvine Live |
                                                • Newsvine Archives |
                                                • The Greenhouse |
                                                COMPANY STUFF:
                                                • Code of Honor |
                                                • Company Info |
                                                • Contact Us |
                                                • Jobs |
                                                • User Agreement |
                                                • Privacy Policy |
                                                • About our ads
                                                LEGAL STUFF:
                                                • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                                                • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                                                • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com